Q&As are dubious
March 2, 2009 4 Comments
In doing research for an article, I came across a Question & Answer session with Kathy Griffin. (Don’t ask). I am starting to hate Q&As. I think they give the subject too much time to be mastubatory and are never as interesting as an article. The only thing I like about them is getting to see the types of questions interviewers asks, but even those seem a bit cheesy. Reporters are supposed to be filters, after all, not enablers!
Yeah, really!
Except perhaps Q&As as sidebars ~ what do you think of those? (Or are those so rare it’s moot?)
I agree. That could be cool. Multi-forms are always useful.
You forgot the once exception: the Sunday NYT magazine’s “Questions for…”, in which the interviewer is the masturbatory one.
Haha, SO TRUE!